| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
What non-free thing
@Mccapra: You tagged this article with {{non-free}}, but why? There is no image here. To what non-free thing are you referring? ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 16:38, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- It shows as a 68% match with this copyright material https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Secrets/barbara_schwarz.html.Mccapra (talk) 16:42, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Okay. That's fixable. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 17:04, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Looking at earwig, these are either short labels or quoted quotes. Is this a problem, then? ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 17:09, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- I’m not an expert in copyvio but that % is pretty high so if you can get it down that will be good. Earwig shows >40% matches for several other items too, so a thorough rewrite is advisable I think. If you leave the copyright tag on a more knowledgeable editor will know whether to pass the article as reviewed or not. Mccapra (talk) 17:18, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Me neither (expert), but at least there's this thread someone can read. I was thinking about it. These are quotes in quotation marks in all three sources; I'm guessing everyone is quoting from a primary source. It's not that this Wikipedia article is quoting from one of those three sources; they're just all covering the same material. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 17:40, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- I’m not an expert in copyvio but that % is pretty high so if you can get it down that will be good. Earwig shows >40% matches for several other items too, so a thorough rewrite is advisable I think. If you leave the copyright tag on a more knowledgeable editor will know whether to pass the article as reviewed or not. Mccapra (talk) 17:18, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Looking at earwig, these are either short labels or quoted quotes. Is this a problem, then? ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 17:09, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Okay. That's fixable. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 17:04, 2 January 2026 (UTC)