User:Czello

❧

This user believes all assertions need
citations from reliable sources.

UAR

This editor believes that account creation should be required to edit on Wikipedia.

This editor is a WikiGnome.

This user has temporary account IP viewer rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

This user has page mover rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

This user reverts vandalism in the blink of an eye with Twinkle!

This user is a new pages patroller with Twinkle!

This user uses HotCat to work with categories.

This user is a proposed deletion patroller.

A few rambling thoughts and hot takes

This user wants it known that he is a prolific user of the en dash (–) but that does not mean that his edits are AI-generated. Indeed, you can find plenty of my talk page comments prior to the rise of LLMs that overuse and abuse the en dash.
I am continuously in awe of just how many users spell out their political/social views on a their user page, such as through a userbox, and yet unashamedly promote these views through their edits unchallenged. While WP:AGF exists, I think we should be bolder in questioning the motive of users who are explicit in their political views when their edits conveniently align with said outlook.
- I wrote WP:INSCRUTABLE, which partially applies to the above, although that was specifically about users who don't spell out their views - but you can figure them out anyway simply by observing their edits over time. Nonetheless, the general message still applies here.
- Similarly, if you want to find a reliable source to say what you want it to say, it's generally easy to do so. In these instances, the personal motivations of editors can skew the POV of an article by using said sources while using WP:DUE to minimise opposing sources.
- Also similarly, sometimes sources are simply wrong in their political descriptions, but there's not much that can be done about that when they're reliable.
Wikipedia is a bureaucracy. While it claims not to be, and shouldn't be, it is deeply and immutably bureaucratic in nature.
WP:NO-PREEMPT is a daft rule.

Articles I have created

Viewable on Wikimedia Commons here. Please feel free to use them anywhere on Wikipedia you feel is appropriate.

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For keeping various political talk pages free from being a promotional soap box and being fast on the revert and report button. Mkdw ^talk 18:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Loolcat20 (talk) 16:04, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

		The Professional Wrestling Barnstar
		Awarded by Vjmlhds on December 19, 2013 for the excellent and detailed diagram on the history of major professional wrestling World Championships, as well as all-around fine work on pro wrestling articles as a whole. 18:27, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks for your swift and thorough evaluation at the ANI about Jay Smith (Christian apologist) . It allowed swift and effective responses from admins. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:21, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

		Erasmus Star
		Awarded to Czello by User:Vjmlhds as part of the Wikipedia community collective win of the 2015 Erasmus Prize

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	Thank you so much for being Bold in breaking off the Timeline of the Mahsa Amini protests from the main article, as the article was indefinitely increasing in size. A million thanks 🙂 Johnson524 (Talk!) 15:29, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

This was very kind. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:30, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you for bringing logic to the discussion. I appreciate you doing that. 4theloveofallthings (talk) 13:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		Thanks for keeping an eye on the All In-related articles whilst I made my way back up north from London! Honestly, I don't get this factional warfare bollocks; can't we all just enjoy the best boom period for the industry since the Attitude Era? Sceptre (talk) 21:57, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

		A fox for you!
		Thanks for keeping Kuci Tribe article safe and stopping vandalism. Setxkbmap (talk) 12:30, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Currently, this editor has earned the Master Editor service award.

To get to the next level, Master Editor II, he needs to meet the editing requirement.

Progress towards the next level (by edits): [ 3031 / 9000 ]

33.7% completed