| This is Catboy69's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Source of Income Discrimination (March 10)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Source of Income Discrimination and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 |
Hello, Catboy69!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 01:55, 10 March 2023 (UTC) |
Homelessness added to US states
You have added data about homelessness to each US state, but the URL provided in your source cited does not link to the data, per WP:CITEWEB, which states: "Please link to URL of specific web page where the referenced content can be found".
If the actual data is found at this URL, could you please go back and add that to your source. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:53, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- The data is at https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/pdf/2022-AHAR-Part-1.pdf, but I didn’t know how to cite that, and I figured people would be able to figure it out, since it is the first attachment on the page. Catboy69 (talk) 16:55, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Actually, the sourced content is found at https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/xls/2007-2022-PIT-Counts-by-State.xlsx. Just go back to your citations and add the correct URL, because your edit is currently not correct. Thanks for your understanding. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:34, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kansas City Tenants Union has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
S0091 (talk) 17:05, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Welcome!
Getting StartedTutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
Tips- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Logos
See WP:Logo and WP:File upload wizard. If you have questions you can ask at the Teahouse. S0091 (talk) 19:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on 2022 Kansas gubernatorial election
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2022 Kansas gubernatorial election, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:32, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Source of Income Discrimination
Hello, Catboy69. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Source of Income Discrimination, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
GOAT tier username
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
December 2023
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. This edit is a clear violation of WP:NPOV. Please use neutral descriptions. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:00, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
I will make sure to be neutral on genocide next time :) Catboy69 (talk) 17:49, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:KC Tenants Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:KC Tenants Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:24, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Open Secrets/donors
Noticed you're going through Congressional articles adding AIPAC contribution amounts based on Open Secrets. I think this is WP:UNDUE. I will be reverting but happy to discuss per WP:BRD -- tagging @Muboshgu and @Marquardtika who may have thoughts one way or the other. Dcpoliticaljunkie (talk) 22:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- I don’t feel it’s undue. I added one sentence for each. I am only adding it to representatives’ pages that reference support for Israel without any positive or negative connotation. Arguably we should add donor information regarding other large lobbying groups and industries on their pages, but I wanted to keep it due weight. For about 90% of the pages I edited (not sure the exact amount), AIPAC was their top donor. I think that is important to highlight, even if the phrasing might need tinkering. Catboy69 (talk) 22:45, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- We don't take raw donor data from the FEC/Open Secrets and pick and choose which to highlight (presented in a manner to imply there is a connection between the donation and positions). If there is a connection, we need a (extremely) reliable source saying that they are connected and, even then, I would argue it needs to be attributed. If we want to start adding a candidate's top donors to their articles, there needs to be a wider consensus and needs to happen for all articles, not just for one specific donor. Dcpoliticaljunkie (talk) 22:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- I think we should add the top donor to all of their pages. Where would we have that discussion? Catboy69 (talk) 22:56, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Either of the two editors I tagged in my first message would likely have a better idea so I would give them a chance to reply but I would suggest starting an WP:RFC on one of the articles where I undid you (can copy this discussion in). I think you'd have more luck getting consensus to add it to articles about each campaign rather than biographies, though. Dcpoliticaljunkie (talk) 22:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Okay I can look into that tomorrow. Catboy69 (talk) 23:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Cool. I will keep an eye out but would appreciate a ping when you start the discussion. Cheers! Dcpoliticaljunkie (talk) 23:15, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Okay I can look into that tomorrow. Catboy69 (talk) 23:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Either of the two editors I tagged in my first message would likely have a better idea so I would give them a chance to reply but I would suggest starting an WP:RFC on one of the articles where I undid you (can copy this discussion in). I think you'd have more luck getting consensus to add it to articles about each campaign rather than biographies, though. Dcpoliticaljunkie (talk) 22:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Also edits like this (linking Schiff calling Omar's remark "never acceptable" to weaponization of antisemitism) is clearly POV pushing and violates NPOV. Dcpoliticaljunkie (talk) 22:56, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- I think we should add the top donor to all of their pages. Where would we have that discussion? Catboy69 (talk) 22:56, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- We don't take raw donor data from the FEC/Open Secrets and pick and choose which to highlight (presented in a manner to imply there is a connection between the donation and positions). If there is a connection, we need a (extremely) reliable source saying that they are connected and, even then, I would argue it needs to be attributed. If we want to start adding a candidate's top donors to their articles, there needs to be a wider consensus and needs to happen for all articles, not just for one specific donor. Dcpoliticaljunkie (talk) 22:52, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for reminding me about the draft else I might have forgot to push it to mainspace before it got autodeleted, and also wanted to thank you for your contribs more broadly regarding your work on housing rights and tenants rights articles. As your already invovled in the project, I might recommend placing them in the new articles section of Wikipedia:WikiProject Housing and Tenant Rights too! Bejakyo (talk) 23:13, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Recent edits
I'm not aware of a simple/non-annoying way of thanking someone for a whole bunch of edits... besides sending them a message on their talk page, so this is me saying thank you for all your work on Tenant screening as of late :) Viv Desjardin (talk, contrib) 16:57, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Commodification of housing moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Commodification of housing. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because While this topic might be notable, this article is full of WP:SYNTH. Only the last section is backed up by sources, the rest of the article, commodification is not mentioned once in any of the sources.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 TT me 14:32, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Nomination for discussion of Template:Centrism US
Template:Centrism US has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:03, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
CS1 error on Time poverty
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Time poverty, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:01, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Time poverty
Hi there! Really appreciate your work on Time poverty. When you add a JSTOR reference, could you please also include the DOI or JSTOR fields? This allows people to use tools like WP:CBOT to fill in other gaps.
- Walker, Julian. "Time poverty, gender and well-being: lessons from the Kyrgyz Swiss Swedish Health Programme". Development in Practice. 23 (1) – via JSTOR.
- Walker, Julian. "Time poverty, gender and well-being: lessons from the Kyrgyz Swiss Swedish Health Programme". Development in Practice. 23 (1). JSTOR 23469259.
- Walker, Julian (2013). "Time poverty, gender and well-being: lessons from the Kyrgyz Swiss Swedish Health Programme". Development in Practice. 23 (1): 57–68. doi:10.1080/09614524.2013.751357. JSTOR 23469259.
Thanks again, and happy editing! Snowman304|talk 02:52, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
A comment about your work-week schedule image
Hello there! I was looking into alternate work day schedules and came across your image contribution to the Six-hour day page. It would appear, however, that your image has eight bars for each comparison, rather than seven! Just wanted to point that out :) Diedie98 (talk) 13:26, 26 November 2025 (UTC)