[
| Wikiclaus greetings | ||
|
have a delicious trout
Whack!
You've been whacked with a wet trout.
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.Orphaned non-free image File:TV.DVD.Hotel.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:TV.DVD.Hotel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Dora-diamante-passport-1 jpg resize.png

Thanks for uploading File:Dora-diamante-passport-1 jpg resize.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
Waking Up
Ciao! Per qualche arcana ragione, mi hanno bocciato la pagina sulla canzone. Sono le solite scuse che non capirò mai (viene detto che la pagina "does not qualify for a Wikipedia entry", la qual cosa è assurda)... Se riesci a salvarla mi fai un grande piacere, perché comunque c'è lavoro dietro e non vedo una ragione plausibile per la quale la pagina dovrebbe essere rifiutata (ormai l'ho capito che è ostracismo dovuto al fatto che non sono registrato, non capirò mai la logica che c'è dietro ma ormai ci ho rinunciato, non sto creando neanche più pagine perché sinceramente sono stanco di sbattermi contro lo stesso muro). Ti ringrazio da ora per l'aiuto! P.S.: Alla fine quella su Cinzia l'hanno accettata (tagliando metà contenuto, ma pazienza, leghiamo l'asino dove vuole il padrone). Se ti va di dare uno sguardo alle altre pagine che ho creato (e che sono state rifiutate altrettanto senza motivo), mi fa piacere! Grazie di nuovo! 82.84.225.97 (talk) 20:34, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Guarda, il problema è a monte, io la soluzione te l'ho offerta. Te l'ho spiegato in tutte le salse come farti un account e pubblicare direttamente le pagine. Se ancora insisti a creare bozze per poi fartele rifiutare, perdendo mesi su una sola pagina, per me tutto ciò non ha senso. Ma evidentemente a te sta bene così. Io la rispetto ma è una tua decisione. Cavarrone 20:49, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Ramsbottom Rides Again.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ramsbottom Rides Again.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Angelo Badalamenti non-free.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Angelo Badalamenti non-free.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:05, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Son of Darkness To Die For II.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Son of Darkness To Die For II.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Carin-goldberg resize.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Carin-goldberg resize.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:09, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
Disruption on the Rihanna article
Hi, Cavarrone. Thank you for your recent edit on Rihanna. I see that you added the "songwriter" occupation back. User 750h+ reverted your edit by removing "songwriter" without any clear consensus to remove it. As a matter of fact, that occupation has been part of the article for at least ten years. It's only that user that keeps removing it. Besides, they are not even supposed to keep reverting since they have already broken the three-revert rule, and they've been reported for it.
Feel free to make the appropriate corrections. As I said, the "songwriter" occupation has been part of the article for at least ten years, and as you noted, many other singers have it in the infobox of their own articles.
On the talk page, I also propose an brief extension to the artistry section in order to demonstrate Rihanna's songwriting craft. (That same user removed it just so they can use the argument that the article doesn't elaborate on her songwriting.) What do you think? Israell (talk) 12:09, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
- I see. I am very tempted to revert their removal, as there is clearly no consensus or policy-based reasons for this, but I dont wanna end up stuck in this debate. At this point it may be best to open an RfC to put an end to the whole thing. Cavarrone 14:20, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
- Problem is, RfC tend to invite canvassing by certain users. Besides, no user owns an article. The debate is going on on that talk page, and there is a very strong pushback from that particular user against any editor who has a different perspective. I refuse to engage any further with that particular user. Israell (talk) 16:03, 27 November 2025 (UTC)