User talk:Dweeby123

I am really really sorry, okay you win I promise to stop using twinkle, please guys just one more chance I'm begging you please, I am truly truly sorry —Dweeby123

Per conversation here and at WP:ANI, and your apparently resorting to some truly lame sockpuppetry to evade this block and advocate for yourself Beeblebrox (talk) 18:50, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

I am hereby requesting that my block be lifted as I feel I wasn't given a chance, to correct my mistakes which were every edit that an - annon user made I thought them to be WP:VAND, However if I do get unblocked I have promised and am promising never to assume Vandalism again. —Dweeby123

Having read everything above AND everything below, I see massive communications problems, massive misunderstanding of even the most basic of policies, and a lower than basic level of WP:COMPETENCE. I believe that you mean well, but you really need to take the time that's left in your block and re-read everything, starting at WP:5P and following every link you find. Promising never to use Twinkle again is a good start, but there's so much more you need to know about editing here (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 08:55, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Please may I return??, I'm sooooooo bored please believe me people I have learnt my lesson honest and I have changed honest Dweeby123

I find it hard to believe you've learnt your lesson so fast considering you were sockpuppeting less than a week ago Jac16888^Talk 15:05, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

I am writing this to ask, that I be unblocked I am very sorry for my previous edits and attitude on here but all I am asking is that I be allowed back to edit again once again, I have very much learnt my lesson and taken heed of all the rules and regulations of Wikipedia, as I said all I am asking is for someone to please give me one Final chance to prove myself, I know It will be hard for anyone to trust me but I hereby promise I Will Never go back on my word, one more chance is all I am asking Thanks in advance —Dweeby123 09:02, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Noting the observation below, you appear to have integrity issues which will prevent us from simply "trusting you". Since you vowed to skirt your block through sockpuppetry, and have lived up to that promise, I see no reason to unblock you. I would suggest going a minimum of six months without evading your block before any future requests are made. This appears to be your fourth declined unblock request; another inadequate request may result in the locking of this page. Kuru (talk) 14:06, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

I am writing this to ask, that I be unblocked as requested to in March I have observed a 6 month hiatus of not appealing this block, I apoligise for the way I behaved, I understand that I deserverd to be blocked at the time and I realise I was very stupid, I am very sorry for my previous edits and attitude on here but all I am asking is that I be allowed back to edit again once again, I have very much learnt my lesson and taken heed of all the rules and regulations of Wikipedia, As I said all I am asking is for someone to please give me one Final chance to prove myself, I know It will be hard for anyone to trust me but I hereby promise I Will Never go back on my word, one more chance is all I am asking Thanks in advance —Dweeby123 15:14, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.

Also note that additional unblock requests which fail to address the above will likely result in the removal of your ability to edit this page. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:53, 26 September 2011 (UTC)