 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,700 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 11 February 2026 by TheObsidianGriffon (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
Comment: Might be AI-generated (public commentary and media section) —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 13:05, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
Chris Brycki is an Australian fintech executive. He is the founder and chief executive officer of Stockspot, a digital investment adviser based in Australia.
Early life and education
Brycki studied at the University of New South Wales, completing a Bachelor of Commerce in accounting and finance.[1]
Career
Brycki began his career in investment management, working as a portfolio manager at UBS. In 2013, he founded Stockspot, a digital investment adviser focused on providing diversified investment portfolios for retail investors.[2][3]
Brycki has served as chief executive officer since the company’s founding in 2013.
In 2017, Stockspot secured investment from Graham Tuckwell.[4]
In 2023, Mirae Asset Financial Group acquired a stake in the company.[5]
Roles and affiliations
Brycki has served on industry and community bodies related to financial services and investing. He has been a member of advisory committees associated with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.[6]
References
- ↑ "What should advisers get paid to push managed funds?". www.businessthink.unsw.edu.au. 16 December 2015.
- ↑ Palmer-Derrien, Stephanie (14 January 2020). "Child prodigy to startup chief: How Chris Brycki turned his passion for stocks into an investment tool for everyday Aussies". SmartCompany.
- ↑ "Stockspot founder Chris Brycki's money is on robo-advice". The Australian. Retrieved 15 July 2017.
- ↑ Writer, Alice UribeFinancial Services (4 May 2017). "Graham Tuckwell leads $3 million investment into robo-adviser Stockspot". Australian Financial Review.
- ↑ "Mirae makes $28m investment in Stockspot". Money Management. 16 August 2023.
- ↑ "17-088MR ASIC establishes Financial Advisers Consultative Committee". asic.gov.au.