User:Saimmx

• Saimmx (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I translate articles from other languages, usually from Chinese. I am an autoreviewer or autopatrolled on Chinese Wikipedia, English Wikivoyage, and Chinese Wikivoyage, and I have created 25 articles on English Wikipedia now. I am therefore interested in the right and believe that I am familiar with the policies and guidelines that autopatrolled may need on the English Wikipedia. Saimmx (talk) 12:17, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

@Saimmx Why ae you interested in the userright? and I have created 25 articles on English Wikipedia now. I am therefore interested in the right seems odd for a userright that grants you no extra privileges (except I guess the ability to unreview your own pages). Sohom (talk) 18:19, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

@Saimmx: Thanks for the translation work you've been doing here on the English Wikipedia! However, I'm seeing a few quality issues in the articles you created last year. The sourcing on List of busiest passenger flight routes and List of busiest passenger flight routes in the 2010s is not ideal — there's quite a heavy reliance on primary sources for statistics, as well as on RoutesOnline, which seems to need more care in its usage based on this April 2025 RfC. Also, on Childhood (Tetsuya Takeda song), an anonymous editor had to fix quite a few translation and formatting errors that had crept in (diff). I haven't done a throuogh scan of your work, but these points seem to indicate that it would be beneficial for new pages patrol to continue reviewing your creations. (Non-administrator comment) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 20:24, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

• (Non-administrator comment) I agree with @TechnoSquirrel69. Kitamura Sae bibliography still requires translation from Japanese to English, and was last edited a month ago. I can't locate the exact guideline/policy page, but English Wikipedia requires all articles to be written in English. This, among the other issues flagged by @TS69, suggests that your article creations should still be reviewed by NPP. Thank you for your translation contributions and happy editing! 11WB (talk) 18:45, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
•  Not done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:22, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

User:Monkeysmashingkeyboards

• Monkeysmashingkeyboards (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I'd like to get AWB for finding and fixing typos on various articles. Nothing too specific, I've always had the nag of finding certain typos/errors that would be trivial to fix en masse with AWB. monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 20:35, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:21, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

User:UltrasonicMadness

• UltrasonicMadness (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

User:Dauntbares

• Dauntbares (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Could I have my confirmed status restored? I am currently at 850 edits--502 are major edits. Dauntbares (talk) 16:43, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days (). — MusikBot ^talk 16:50, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

 Not done this was just removed 10 days ago. The standard is that you will need 30 days and 500 constructive edits after a removal. Once you are at that point, come back. — xaosflux ^Talk 14:49, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, that wasn't explained to me. Dauntbares (talk) 15:10, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

You may follow up with the removing administrator to see if they want to work out something else with you. — xaosflux ^Talk 19:09, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll reach out. Dauntbares (talk) 14:04, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

User:MrDenjiLover

• MrDenjiLover (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I meet every requirement but for some reason I don't have it. There is an error. Can I have EC? MrDenjiLover ^🗣️ (Non-binary) 18:26, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

 Not done Your account isn't quite a month old yet. The software will give you ECP automatically on your first edit after you meet the criteria - there's no need to manually ask. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:25, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

User:Antoine le Deuxième

• Antoine le Deuxième (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I would like to request an extension of my NPP reviewer rights. I have been reviewing pages cautiously and less frequently as I continue to build experience and ensure that my actions fully comply with policy. I expect my activity to increase as my confidence grows. Antoine le Deuxième (talk) 20:03, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

@Antoine le Deuxième as far as I can see, you've used the curation tool three times and you've manually patrolled 0 pages. Is there something else I should be basing my decision on? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:58, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

That's all for now, but I would like to patrol more articles as I get a better understanding of the rules. Antoine le Deuxième (talk) 14:10, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

 Done, I don't see any issue with extending for another month. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:39, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! Antoine le Deuxième (talk) 15:04, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

User:KeyolTranslater

• KeyolTranslater (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Good day everyone, I am here today to place a request to be an New page reviewer. I have over 500 live mainspace edits and I have been a confirmed user since August 2025. I have had experience with writing, improving and having pages declined (which I then improved and learnt why they were declined), I have also have experience with AFD requests (which I have made a few when appropriate). I have also helped out at the Teahouse and helped other users with edits and drafts.

One of the main reasons why I would like to become an AFC reviewer is because I have seen an influx of what I call “Dud” articles, articles which don’t abide by Wikipedia’s rules, or aren’t notable (you see a lot on the Teahouse, and on the Draft list, articles about an individual, a family member or personal company), and I would like to help out in my spare time to clear up these articles and help with the backlog.

Thank you for reading. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 20:44, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days (). — MusikBot ^talk 20:47, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

I'm inclined to grant a trial run, but KeyolTranslater, are you familiar with the differences between WP:AfC and WP:NPP? Just want to make sure you're applying for the right permission. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:42, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Right after writing this request I realised I might’ve put my request in the wrong place, and so I read both pages again and I do realise that NPP is new pages, and AFC is drafts, and I think I have made a mistake, although wouldn’t mind helping both. Apologies if I have taken up our time. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 15:07, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

That's ok, just wanted to make sure you were clear on what you were signing up for.  Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:59, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, I am honoured and shall help you all out. Mwen Sé Kéyòl Translator-a (talk) 19:22, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

User:Medievalfran

• Medievalfran (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi there! I'd like to request page reviewer rights - it's something I haven't really considered before, but spurred on by the backlog of women's biographies that need reviewing according to the Women in Red initiative. I have a good track record of creating/ improving articles to beyond stub level, and have been through the AFC process or supported new editors through the process both virtually-only and at in person wikithons that I lead or co-facilitate. I make clear to new editors if their ideas for new articles are not suitable (do not meet notability criteria, not enough sources), and support them to find other pages on-wiki where their well-sourced information can live. Thanks for considering me! Medievalfran (talk) 12:38, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Hello @Medievalfran! Your talk page shows you've had at least a couple of articles accepted through AfC, though Walter C. Leedy does have some sourcing issues, specifically WP:BLOGGER, which should not be used in biography articles like that one. You have no history at WP:AfD, I would highly recommend getting some experience there by participating in some discussions and !voting. Focusing on topics that interest you would be the easiest way to get involved! AfD history is one of the primary things administrators who grant NPR look for, as it can demonstrate knowledge of the relevant policies and guidelines that are important when reviewing articles. You say you've supported editors through AfC, this would demonstrate excellent experience, so I would recommend leaving some links here so the admins can take a look when they begin reviewing this request! Thanks for applying and good luck! 11WB (talk) 10:02, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

 Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:45, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

User:CrazyMountainCreator

• CrazyMountainCreator (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have been active in a multitude of articles across multiple different subjects. I have remained active for over 90 days and have edited articles more than 500 times. new page reviewer rights. I believe I will be a fair judge for the new articles coming in and give good feedback for said articles. CrazyMountainCreator (talk) 21:20, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 42 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 21:20, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

You appear to have 42 edits to mainspace and 91 edits total, which puts you well short of the minimum prerequisites.  Not done at this time. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:47, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

User:D.18th

• D.18th (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I am currently an active AfC reviewer, and I would like to expand my efforts to the New Pages Feed to help maintain mainspace quality. Having the NPR right will allow me to seamlessly handle articles that bypass the AfC process. ꕥ 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 ꕥ ^{→𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎←} 08:34, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

User:LeapTorchGear

• LeapTorchGear (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

User:AKidFromBethany

• AKidFromBethany (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi! I am a frequent RC patroller requesting PCR rights to get some new experience fighting vandalism. I often use RedWarn to easily take down vandals and getting a new way to help out the wiki would mean a lot to me :) Thanks for considering! akidfrombethany!(_talk|^contribs) 18:16, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

User:Swoonfed

• Swoonfed (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

User:TrueMoriarty

• TrueMoriarty (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello. I am requesting rollback rights to combat vandalism in Wikipedia. I qualify to all the criteria mentioned above. I have been in monthly top five pending changes reviewer multiple times and I think if I have rollback rights, I can prevent vandalism even better and make Wikipedia a nicer place. Also, I have read the Wikipedia articles on rollback and reviewing changes thoroughly. TrueMoriarty (talk) 12:39, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

@TrueMoriarty although it's not directly relevant to rollback, I'm concerned about your very recent brush with copright (cc Diannaa). Is there anything you can say about that that would make me more comfortable? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:22, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

@HJ Mitchell. Hello. I deeply regret what occurred about that copyright issue, but believe me, my intentions were not bad. It was purely an accident and here’s what really happened. It is slightly troublesome to change tabs repeatedly while creating an article, so I copy-pasted the whole thing in my sandbox, where I thought I would peacefully take information from the article in question to the article I was creating. While creating the article, I was fully aware of copyright, notability, style and other guidelines but at that certain moment I was under considerable mental pressure and I accidentally mistook some paragraphs of the copy-pasted article as written by me so I just gave references and published it. It was kind of a mix-up. Like my paragraphs were there and so were the paragraphs of the copy-pasted articles and I accidentally deleted mine and kept the copy-pasted ones. Once again, I apologize sincerely for my mistakes and I hope I will be forgiven and be given rollback rights. Have good day!TrueMoriarty (talk) 07:32, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

User:Ixocactus

• Ixocactus (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi! I'm trying to use WP:KIWF and MassRoolback scripts to revert a block evasion, but both scripts didn't worked. I suppose that with this permission I will can perform some useful tasks. I'm aware of rules around it and will not abuse the tools. Thanks! Ixocactus (talk) 19:02, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

User:Jiltedsquirrel

• Jiltedsquirrel (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello, I regularly patrol recent changes and I would love to have more tool access for better counter-vandalism efficiency. Jiltedsquirrel 🌰 ^{(talk || contribs)} 23:31, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

User:AirmanKitten203

• AirmanKitten203 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I am requesting rollback rights because I want to be able to continue and help with the fight against vandalism. Recently, I have become more aware of the tools out there used to assist someone in reviewing recent change logs and being able to quickly fix vandalism. Most if not all of these tools require rollback permissions. I understand if one may be hesitant to grant due to my past but I can assure you that I have working hard to prove that I am here to edit in good faith and help to keep Wikipedia safe and reliable. If possible, I would like these rights to be granted (even if I need to go under a trial to prove I am not going to abuse). Thank you, AirmanKitten203 (talk) 03:04, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days () and has 37 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 03:10, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

I have more main-space edits than that. AirmanKitten203 (talk) 12:23, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) AirmanKitten203, you can see your edits by namespace on xtools, where it says you have 37 mainspace contributions. Any edits in talk:, wikipedia:, draft:, user:, etc are not counted towards this number. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 15:13, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

 Not done; per the box at the top we would like to see at least 200 mainspace edits. Giraffer (talk) 15:22, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Alright, thank you. I didn't realize that it didn't count. AirmanKitten203 (talk) 15:34, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

User:AKidFromBethany

• AKidFromBethany (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Frequent RC patroller, I'd like rollback so I can fight vandals even harder than I do now! Thanks ^^ akidfrombethany!(_talk|^contribs) 18:12, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

User:GZhong

• GZhong (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Reason for requesting rollback rights Would like to try out WikiShield to see if it will improve the experience of RC patrol G Zhong 18:49, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

User:Dafootballguy

• Dafootballguy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

User:CapnZapp

• CapnZapp (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I should begin by saying I'm not even sure this is the right action to take. I don't see myself needing to edit high-risk templates, work in sandboxes, or answer edit requests. However, several much more "ordinary" templates are protected nowadays, and I feel sufficiently established I don't want to bother others with relatively trivial changes, such as textual changes that don't require mastery of wiki or lua code. I do feel confident I won't accidentally wreck things. If you reading this really think we still live in an ideal world where only templates that would otherwise need full protection have template protection, then you should deny this request. Otherwise, I can think of maybe one instance every other month where I just left something alone even though having this right would enable to quickly fix something small, with next to no risk. Cheers, CapnZapp (talk) 17:41, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:

1. Y (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 18)
2. Y (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~19k)
3. Y (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: 469)
4. Y (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: NA)
5. N (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 0)
6. N (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: ~0, noting that there are ~5 simple/trivial requests mainly to edit notices)

Primefac (talk) 10:57, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Can you provide some examples of successful requests and examples of changes you'd make if you had the user right? voorts (talk/contributions) 17:59, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

User:EchidnaLives

• EchidnaLives (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I was granted the permission in November until the 1st of January, and would like to re-request it. I utilised it a few times when monitoring vandals who were using numerous temporary accounts, and would like to continue to have access to the tool for future anti-vandalism efforts. I continue to understand the relevant policy and will follow it at all times when viewing the IPs of temporary accounts. Thanks, echidnalives - talk - edits 09:11, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

 Done Sohom (talk) 09:41, 13 January 2026 (UTC)