User talk:Emilydaniel

October 2025

Hello Emilydaniel. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Emilydaniel. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Emilydaniel|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 14:35, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: User:Emilydaniel/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Emilydaniel/sandbox. Thanks! bonadea contributions talk 14:36, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

I am not paid for editing just trying to improve my skills in writing for authors because I love reading books and books that helps students and personality I think it's great to share with Wikipedia terms please am sorry if I have done what is wrong please Emilydaniel (talk) 14:44, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

And there's a fact that she's one of my boss, like someone I looks up to. I feel for her books and that motivate me to work on publishing my own books Emilydaniel (talk) 14:47, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Jeanne Bender, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Emilydaniel/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 14:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Emilydaniel! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 14:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Jeanne Bender has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jeanne Bender. Thanks! AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 03:10, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeanne Bender has been accepted

Jeanne Bender, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 03:12, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Please what error is there in my writing or what cleanup do I have to do to the article, please help me to understand please Emilydaniel (talk) 04:49, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Jeanne Bender for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeanne Bender, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeanne Bender until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Please is literate books not acceptable on Wikipedia? I have disclose the fact that no payment attached, and I don't even know the person just trying my editing skills and I'll appreciate if there can be any form of suggestion on names I can research and write about to increase my writing ability or what to do to improve the current article Emilydaniel (talk) 04:43, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

You said above "she's one of my boss" so clearly you have a connection which you need to disclose. Theroadislong (talk) 11:02, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

@Theroadislong Okay, I got that right there

How do i disclose she's my boss and you know there's no form of compesation or anything Emilydaniel (talk) 11:27, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

If she is your boss you will be deemed a paid editor here, see Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Theroadislong (talk) 11:31, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

@TheroadislongYou mean i must tagged myself that i'm been paid for it? Emilydaniel (talk) 11:33, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

That's correct. Theroadislong (talk) 11:34, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for that

Can you then help me with the tag I'll use and where i can insert it, I want someone who can guilde and mentor me@Theroadislong Emilydaniel (talk) 11:38, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

@Theroadislong

Paid contribution disclosure

I am editing Wikipedia on behalf of Jeanne Bender as a paid editor. My contributions are made to improve the accuracy and neutrality of information. I will follow Wikipedia's conflict of interest and paid editing policies.

Is it right like this? Emilydaniel (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Details here WP:COIPAYDISCLOSE but what you have done above would suffice... if it were moved to your user page. Theroadislong (talk) 11:49, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

You mean i should type like this WP:COIPAYDISCLOSE on my user talk page that's all? Emilydaniel (talk) 11:53, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

No... click the link for details of how to disclose. Theroadislong (talk) 11:55, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Okay, Thanks Emilydaniel (talk) 11:57, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Like this @Theroadislong

== Conflict of Interest Disclosure ==

{{connected contributor Jeanne Bender}} I am editing the article about Jeanne Bender because she is my employer.

I was not paid specifically to edit this article, but I am disclosing this connection in accordance with Wikipedia’s conflict of interest and transparency policies. I intend to follow all guidelines on neutrality, sourcing, and edit requests when necessary. Emilydaniel (talk) 12:13, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

I have added the disclosure for you, though it is rather too late as the article has been deleted here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeanne Bender. Theroadislong (talk) 14:15, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks but can I still recreate the article or I should not try anymore. Emilydaniel (talk) 22:59, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Miracle Chidi Dike moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Miracle Chidi Dike. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ednabrenze (talk) 14:09, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yue Xiong (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Win Kyaw were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yue Xiong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WinKyaw (talk) 09:08, 1 January 2026 (UTC)