User talk:Kelob2678

❧

Wikipedia

Welcome!

Hi Kelob2678! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Mellk (talk) 22:47, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Please note that due to WP:RUSUKR, editors who are not extended confirmed are unable to make edits related to the Russia-Ukraine war, broadly construed. Thank you. Mellk (talk) 04:03, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

GUPVI

Hi, can you explain why you deleted the table you added yourself? --Altenmann >talk 20:58, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

The camps were not focused solely on POWs; statistics should also reflect information on civilians, which I am currently unable to add. Kelob2678 (talk) 09:55, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

June 2025

Information icon Hi Kelob2678! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Belarusian Orthodox Church and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 11:56, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Reverted previous changes and reapplied them without the minor edit flag. Kelob2678 (talk) 12:03, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks

Just a small thank you for your work on Belarus and the elections. I know a lot of the most important articles for Belarus are sparsely covered and poor, especially politics in a lot of cases, even if they are notable, and it doesn't help with the WikiProject being (very) inactive. Keep up what you are doing with the work on here - it is of high quality. • Apollo468•  03:17, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

August 2025

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as List of United States cities by crime rate. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:39, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

Great work. Keep it up

I saw you recently improved the Vladimir Putin article. I thought you might be interested in improving the article so it has a bigger audience.

I did some preliminary research and come up with this:

Refined query:

I hope you found the information helpful. And I hope you lead the charge to improve the article. I would do it myself, but off wiki activities prevent me from doing so.

Was the information helpful? If you are not able to improve the article, do you know others who would be interested? Knox490 (talk) 07:28, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Kelob2678. Thank you for your work on Ferdinand Feldbrugge. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start! Since this article falls under WP:BLP, please add in-line citations to the few claims that do not already have footnotes. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 09:02, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

@Mariamnei: Which claims are unreferenced? Kelob2678 (talk) 09:17, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klavdiya Gadyuchkina

Your contribution here, was well researched, essential and, in my opinion, might just help finally bring to an end the far too early and often totally unnecessary creation of these pages. While some supercentenarian pages are obviously needed and are, to a certain degree, interesting, the vast majority are mundane beyond belief and completely unencyclopedic. Sincere regards, MattSucci (talk) 14:57, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

RfC - Airport destination lists

Hi, for your information, as you were involved in the previous discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Airport destination lists or the RfC on consensus of WP:DESTNOT at WT:NOT, I wanted to let you know that the discussed broader RfC has been opened at WP:VPP#RfC - The inclusion of destination lists in Airport articles. If you wish to contribute, please feel free. Many thanks! Danners430 tweaks made 21:08, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Tentative list of List of World Heritage Sites in the Soviet Union

In Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of World Heritage Sites in the Soviet Union, you stated "tentative list. The 1989 list for the SU contained 28 elements, of which 25 were later inscribed". As I want to get this article to WP:Featured list candidates, do you have any sources for the 1989 tentative list of the Soviet Union? If you could provide a link to them, I would be able to expand it enough to meet the length and completeness requirements that the WP:Featured list criteria require. Thank you, User:Easternsaharareview this 05:40, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

I took it from page 300 of this book. The relevant quote is, It comprised 28 properties, of which only twelve matched or varied slightly from the properties listed earlier. It cites UNESCO archives as a source, but I wasn't able to access them online. On page 228, there is another list by the Soviet Union, it is complete, but not final. Kelob2678 (talk) 12:01, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Kelob2678!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

BhikhariInformer (talk) 16:53, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion thanks

Thanks for catching my mistake on Mohini Mohan Dhar. I'm not sure why I made that mistake but you are correct that since the article was created by the sockpuppet of a banned user, it should be speedy deleted. The article is now gone. SouthernNights (talk) 00:12, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. Kelob2678 (talk) 00:24, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Seeking Guidance on the Review of Zaheer Farooqui's Article Deletion

Hi Kelob2678,

I hope you are doing well. I noticed that you were among the editors who participated in the deletion discussion for the Wikipedia page on Zaheer Farooqui, as listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaheer Farooqui. I am reaching out to seek your guidance on the appropriate way to request a review of the deletion and explore the possibility of restoring the article.

Since the page was deleted, I have come across additional independent and reliable news coverage that was not included in the earlier version of the article. This includes reporting by established news organisations on Zaheer Farooqui’s work as Chairman of the Purkazi Nagar Panchayat, particularly relating to local governance, education initiatives, and community development. Some of this coverage appears to post-date the earlier AfD discussion and may be relevant to the notability concerns that were raised at the time.

My intention is to ensure that any further steps fully align with Wikipedia’s content policies, including WP and sourcing guidelines. Before taking action, I wanted to seek community input and advice from experienced editors like yourself on the most appropriate process—whether that be a deletion review, draft recreation, or another recommended approach.

If you are willing, I would greatly appreciate any guidance you can offer on how best to proceed. Your insight would be very helpful in ensuring that any future submission is policy-compliant and constructive.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Kind regards

Wikicon07 Wikicon07 (talk) 15:16, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Airport destination lists sourcing RfC

Hi there,

I'm leaving this message because you contributed to the recent RfC regarding the inclusion of airport destination lists. As promised, now that that RfC has closed, I've initiated a further discussion about the sourcing standards to be applied to these lists.

If you wish to contribute to the discussion, please do so at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Airport destination lists - sourcing requirements.

Cheers! Danners430 tweaks made 15:23, 19 January 2026 (UTC)