User talk:Kingsman1586

❧

Wikipedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ralph II, Count of Vermandois has been accepted

Ralph II, Count of Vermandois, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spinster300 (talk) 08:26, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roger d'Aubigny (died 1104) (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LunaEclipse was:
This article lacks inline citations. Please resubmit this draft when you have added them.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
πŸ’½ πŸŒ™Eclipse πŸ’½ 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 23:39, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Kingsman1586! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! πŸ’½ πŸŒ™Eclipse πŸ’½ 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 23:39, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Roger d'Aubigny (died 1104)

Information icon Hello, Kingsman1586. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roger d'Aubigny (died 1104), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:08, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Roger d'Aubigny (died 1104)

Hello, Kingsman1586. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Roger d'Aubigny".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:39, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

All good. Kingsman1586 (talk) 14:20, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roger d'Aubigny (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Commandant Quacks-a-lot was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please use inline citations. Also, if you could possibly find more detail to add to the article, that would be great.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 21:24, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Excellent Work!

Wacky-looking coat of arms of the Order of the Exceptional Editor
You have been granted this award which I just made up to thank you for your wonderful contributions to various medieval nobles. Thanks again, and keep up the good work! πŸ‘ Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 18:15, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Thank you 🍻 Kingsman1586 (talk) 19:05, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello Kingsman1586, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026.
Happy editing,

Abishe (talk) 03:35, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 03:35, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roger d'Aubigny (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lijil was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia articleβ€”that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Thanks for your contributions! I'm afraid I can't see that this person fulfills the inclusion criteria for having a Wikipedia article about him (notability). He does not appear to fulfill WP:GNG or any of the typical notability criteria for an individual. I see you are a member of WP:WikiProject Middle Ages - if you know about more specific notability guidelines that apply to medieval aristocrats, can you please link to them and explain how they are fulfilled in this article? Or perhaps it is possible to find more sources with reliable information about this person?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Lijil (talk) 23:32, 31 December 2025 (UTC)