Welcome!
Hi Lokiretro! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Reference formatting
Please do not add the club as the 'author' on edits like this, it's not accurate. GiantSnowman 21:13, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Revert
Can I ask why you are reverting when discussion is still taking place. We arent anywhere near a change of consensus at this point.Blethering Scot 23:02, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
- i use @HalfOfAnOrange temporary solution https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2025%E2%80%9326_Wrexham_A.F.C._season&oldid=1304417303 Lokiretro (talk) 23:06, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
- Just to state its not a temporary solution. Its always been an accepted solution. As I stated I was not doing the work for them, and if they wanted to do that they could have. I have used it myself many times, but as i stated you need to be careful cause I have fucked it up multiple times over the years, and im very careful.Blethering Scot 23:10, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
- Also please make sure your edit summaries are clear. It was not clear that's what you intended, or have done looking at the summaries. Blethering Scot 23:11, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
- looking back at it again, even if i add
will comment it out in next edit
, i agree it is not clear. sorry for that Lokiretro (talk) 23:24, 5 August 2025 (UTC)- Guessing you are a Wrexham fan?Blethering Scot 23:34, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
- yes and? Lokiretro (talk) 23:38, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
- And nothing. I was just asking and was going to reply nicely, but seen as you have taken offence to me asking I will not bother with being friendly. Blethering Scot 23:46, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
- sorry, i dont mean offence. the question confused me related to first thread so i kinda dont know how to answer that and the text dont convey that confused tone
- i am new here and i may mistake or another unclear commit in future, so you could friendly message me in the future. thank you Lokiretro (talk) 00:07, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
- And nothing. I was just asking and was going to reply nicely, but seen as you have taken offence to me asking I will not bother with being friendly. Blethering Scot 23:46, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
- yes and? Lokiretro (talk) 23:38, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
- Guessing you are a Wrexham fan?Blethering Scot 23:34, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
- Just to state its not a temporary solution. Its always been an accepted solution. As I stated I was not doing the work for them, and if they wanted to do that they could have. I have used it myself many times, but as i stated you need to be careful cause I have fucked it up multiple times over the years, and im very careful.Blethering Scot 23:10, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Brackets
Hi. I am very familiar with the usage of double square brackets for wikilinks, double curly brackets for templates, but what do the double round brackets do here? Just asking as I have never seen this before. -- 92.18.76.185 (talk) 14:28, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- They don't do anything. LuniZunie 14:29, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- Help:Citation Style 1#Accept-this-as-written markup
There are occasions where Module:Citation/CS1 emits error or maintenance messages because of, or makes changes to, the values assigned to a select set of parameters. Special markup can be used to enforce that a value will nonetheless be accepted as written. The markup for this is ((value)), i.e., wrap the entire parameter value in two sets of parentheses. Parameters that support this markup are:
Lokiretro (talk) 22:50, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
 |
Hello Lokiretro! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 18 November 2025 (UTC)