User talk:Maat777

Wikipedia

April 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Elewijt has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Elewijt was changed by MathiDG (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.908434 on 2019-04-27T12:46:09+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:46, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences Editing Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!  Velella  Velella Talk   12:41, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi MathiDG! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 10:28, Tuesday, January 19, 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi MathiDG! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 15:44, Tuesday, January 19, 2021 (UTC)

Maat777


T Maat777 (talk) 07:15, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Control copyright icon Hello Maat777! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. MCE89 (talk) 14:09, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello MCE89.
Thank you for the answer. This was my first creation so I wasn't sure on how to save the page for myself. I still wanted to edit it, with better references. But I accidentally published it already. Still, thank you for the tips! Maat777 (talk) 13:57, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Aldrich Court Building moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Aldrich Court Building. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 TT me 10:59, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

CS1 error on Colour trade mark

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Colour trade mark, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:05, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rolex v EUIPO (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ultraodan was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ultraodan (talk) 02:12, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Maat777! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ultraodan (talk) 02:12, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sabel v Puma has been accepted

Sabel v Puma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jcgaylor (talk) 00:09, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

Award for Sabel v. Puma Article

Outstanding New Article
Thank you for creating a wonderful article that expands Wikipedia's available knowledge! Jcgaylor (talk) 00:14, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dyson v Registrar of Trade Marks has been accepted

Dyson v Registrar of Trade Marks, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jcgaylor (talk) 00:20, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

Cover Story (2002 film)

IMDb is not considered a reliable source, as its content is user generated. Also, the Rotten Tomatoes and Letterboxd links were just directory listings that gave no information of substance.

Directory listings on their own are not sufficient in the absence of further coverage. I'm not super well versed on film, but I do know that major sources would include reliable third-party reviews from established critics; newspaper, magazine, or journal articles on the making of the film; books that dedicate substantial information to the film beyond just a directory listing; et cetera. IMDb and the automatically generated placeholders that RT and Letterboxd give to every film are not enough. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 19:35, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Ok I fully understand. But why is the whole edit revirted? I still fixed the orphan issue. Maat777 (talk) 20:35, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Reinstating the orphan tag was a mistake on my part. I fixed it. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:11, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rolex v EUIPO has been accepted

Rolex v EUIPO, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Earth605talk 08:24, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Aldrich Court Building

Information icon Hello, Maat777. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aldrich Court Building, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Aldrich Court Building

Hello, Maat777. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Aldrich Court Building".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 12:25, 13 January 2026 (UTC)