User talk:Skye Ava

Please peddle your APKs elsewhere

apkteraboxx.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:47, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Skye Ava (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello. I apologize for my previous edits. I was new to Wikipedia and I misunderstood the rules. I added links that were considered promotional, but that was not my intention. I now fully understand that Wikipedia requires independent, reliable sources and does not allow self-promotion.

I promise that if unblocked, I will follow all Wikipedia policies and only make constructive, non-promotional edits. Please consider unblocking me. Thank you. Skye Ava (talk) 14:56, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Accept reason:

You are conditionally unblocked subject to a prohibition from editing about storage software and apps, logged at Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Skye Ava. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:04, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Skye Ava (talk) 14:56, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Skye Ava! Can you please clarify your relationship with Apkteraboxx? Also, it would be helpful if you could describe, in your own words, why the previous edits could have been seen as promotional, and what you will do differently in future edits. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 21:01, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Chaotic Enby, thank you for your message. apkteraboxx is my website, and I now understand that adding links to sites I am involved with can appear promotional. I apologize for the previous edits and will focus on making constructive contributions supported only by independent, reliable sources in the future. Thank you for reviewing my request. Skye Ava (talk) 06:50, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for being transparent about this! Understanding that you should not add links to your website (or related websites) in the future is a big step on the path to being unblocked. Ideally, it is best to stay away entirely from editing in a topic you have a real-life financial stake in, and I would be okay with giving you another chance, with a restriction from editing about storage software and apps as an unblock condition. Are you okay with that? Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 12:42, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Yes, I understand and I agree to these conditions. I will avoid editing topics where I have any financial interest, including storage software and apps. Thank you very much for giving me another chance. Skye Ava (talk) 12:50, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

@Ohnoitsjamie, are you okay with me making a "last chance" unblock under these supervised conditions? Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 13:08, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Yes, with the understanding that any future edits with any semblance of advertising will result in an immediate block. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:57, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Yes, I understand and fully agree to the conditions. I will ensure that all my future contributions are neutral and well-sourced. Thank you for giving me this last chance. Skye Ava (talk) 15:16, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

You are now unblocked! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:18, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Skye Ava (talk) 15:23, 10 December 2025 (UTC)