User talk:OberstFischer1945

❧

Wikipedia

Welcome!

Hello, OberstFischer1945, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Mathglot and I've volunteered to be your Wikipedia mentor. I'm here for you whenever you need help with Wikipedia. It's great to have you on board to help create this online encyclopedia.

Some chocolate chip cookies stacked on a plate.
Have a plate of cookies!

See your homepage for a brief tutorial. Here are a few links you might find helpful:

Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or the Task Center.

Help is available: as your Mentor, you can always find me listed in the "Get editing help" module bottom right on your homepage; there are also additional help links there. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or try the Wikipedia:Teahouse to get help designed especially for new users from a team of experienced volunteers. So go ahead and ask questions — we’re here to help!

Once again, welcome to Wikipedia! Mathglot (talk) 06:01, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Franz Eccard von Bentivegni (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CabinetCavers was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not enough sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
CabinetCavers (thou shalt speaketh) 13:04, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, OberstFischer1945! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CabinetCavers (thou shalt speaketh) 13:04, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Kurt-Siegfried Schrader moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kurt-Siegfried Schrader, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 05:31, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kurt-Siegfried Schrader has been accepted

Kurt-Siegfried Schrader, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

guninvalid (talk) 18:29, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Kurt-Siegfried Schrader

This has been reverted. There now has been two editors who have reviewed this article and found it wanting. There is no coverage on the subject outside this battle. Its simply non-notable and shouldn't have been promoted. Don't revert it. Redirects are cheaper but it will go to WP:AFD and an edit war noticeboard. scope_creepTalk 17:49, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Easy Red 2 cover art.jpg

icon Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page may fail our non-free policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted file of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:33, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi OberstFischer1945. Wikipedia's non-free content use policy is quite restrictive by design, and one of these restrictions is that non-free content like File:Easy Red 2 cover art.jpg can only be used (i.e., displayed) in the article namespace. This is why JJMC89bot kept removing the file from Draft:Easy Red 2 each time you re-added and also why I have removed (actually I've just hidden it) the file once again. It's OK if you didn't know about this restriction, but please wait until the draft has been approved as an article before re-adding the file again. If you keep re-adding the file before that time, it will keep getting removed either by that same bot or by some other user; moreover, now that it has been explained to you why the file was being removed, continuing to re-add will likely be seen by a Wikipedia administrator as being disruptive. You don't need to worry about the file being deleted before the draft is approved because deleted files are really just hidden from public view (they're still on Wikipedia's servers) and can easily be restored by a Wikipedia administrator if the reason why they were delete is subsequently resolved. So, my suggestion to you would be to continue working on your draft, making sure it meets Wikipedia:Notability (video games), and wait until it has been accepted as an article before adding any non-free content to it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:48, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
Alright JJMC89bot already confirmed me about that. OberstFischer1945 (talk) 03:01, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Easy Red 2 cover art.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Easy Red 2 cover art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:17, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

The article which is intended to use the image is currently a draft. OberstFischer1945 (talk) 06:10, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
See it here: Draft:Easy Red 2 OberstFischer1945 (talk) 06:10, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
You're responding to a notification added by a WP:BOT, which is an automated account tasked to do certain types of routine things on Wikipedia. So, it won't reply back.
As I posted above, all non-free content is required by Wikipedia's non-free content use policy to be used in at least one article. Non-free content not being used in any articles is considered "orphaned non-free use" and is eligible for speedy deletion per WP:F5. So, removing the speedy deletion template from the file's page will not stop the same bot from coming back and re-adding the same template as long as the file remains unused in any articles. As I also posted above, you don't need to worry about the file being deleted because it can always be restored by a Wikipedia administrator once the draft you're working on has been accepted as an article, and there's a valid non-free use for the file. WP:F5 deletions are considered to be non-contentious deletions (sort of like routine housekeeping), and all you'll need to do is make a WP:REFUND request once the draft has been approved. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:48, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Easy Red 2 (February 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrxces was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No evidence of reception - the Metacritic score, upon investigating, is just...one score from one source.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 11:21, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
Problem is I can't find much sources covering Easy Red 2 since it isn't popular enough. OberstFischer1945 (talk) 14:39, 12 February 2026 (UTC)